Conveyor Belt Cleaner XHD: Your Tensioner Is Doubling Belt Pressure — and the Gauge Will Never Show It
FM8 Engineering | Technical Series | Belt Cleaner Systems
The conveyor belt is the asset. A primary belt cleaner blade is a consumable, engineered on the same principle as a train wheel: designed to wear sacrificially so that the asset it serves, the rail, is protected from damage. The wheel wears. The track survives. In the same way, the cleaning blade should carry the wear so the belt does not. A conveyor belt in bulk materials handling carries replacement value in the order of $1.5–$2M. The blade costs a fraction of that. Its entire purpose is to protect the asset beneath it.
That principle fails when the blade applies too much force to the belt surface. When a conventional XHD belt cleaner is commissioned on site, the technician sets the tensioner to the pressure specified in the OEM IOM (Installation and Operation Manual). This is the manufacturer's documented commissioning procedure: the IOM states a pressure value, the technician sets it, and that is the approved method. That value, followed correctly, already exceeds the accepted industry recommended maximum for blade-to-belt contact pressure. The belt is over-loaded from day one. As the blade wears, the Class 1 lever geometry of the tensioner arm amplifies that force further, progressively and silently, with no change to the gauge reading. By end of blade life, contact pressure is 90% above the industry ceiling at OEM settings. After the second mainframe reset, following the IOM to the letter, it spikes to 81% above the limit. The consumable is no longer protecting the asset. It is attacking it.
16 June 2026 · Written By FM8 Engineering · 29 min read
The Problem with Pressure Settings on Primary Belt Cleaners
A cleaning blade and a train wheel share the same engineering logic. The train wheel is designed to wear. The rail is designed to last. The wheel is the sacrificial component, machined to tolerances that ensure it degrades before the track does, because the track is the asset and replacing it costs orders of magnitude more than re-profiling or replacing a wheel. Every primary belt cleaner blade operates on exactly the same principle: it is a consumable, purpose-built to carry the abrasive wear that would otherwise be inflicted on the belt. The belt is the asset. The blade protects it by taking the wear itself.
That logic only holds when the blade applies force within limits the belt can sustain without accelerated damage. Exceed those limits and the consumable becomes a liability. The blade wears as intended. The belt wears faster than it should. The asset the blade was designed to protect absorbs damage the engineer never intended it to absorb.
Walk up to any XHD conveyor belt cleaner tensioner on a bulk materials handling operation and read the pressure gauge. It shows the value your technician set at installation, following the OEM IOM specification to the letter. The gauge has not moved. The setting has not changed. That OEM-specified setting was already applying 16 kPa to the belt surface on the first revolution of belt travel after installation, against an accepted industry recommended maximum of 14 kPa.
The actual blade-to-belt contact pressure at the primary cleaner position is a different number entirely, and in most cases a larger one. The gauge measures air spring pressure. Contact pressure at the belt surface is governed by the geometry of the Class 1 lever system that converts spring pressure into blade force. At new-blade installation, the pressure your technician set per the OEM IOM already loads the belt above the accepted industry ceiling. As the blade wears and the lever geometry changes, that load rises further, steadily, progressively, and with no visible indicator on the tensioner. The gauge stays put. The belt takes more force with every passing week.
Detailed field studies and measurement data collected across high-throughput bulk handling conveyors quantify this effect precisely. The numbers are not marginal. A conventional blade at its own OEM pressure setting starts 14% above the industry recommended maximum, spikes to 81% above after the second mainframe reset, and finishes 90% above it. That loading is applied to the belt top cover and splice at the primary cleaner position on every belt revolution, across every shift, for the full blade service life. The belt is rarely identified as the casualty. It should be.
The Misconception Behind Standard Pressure Management
The standard maintenance approach is to set tensioner air pressure at installation per the manufacturer IOM specification, check and hold that value at each mainframe reset, and change blades out when they have worn to the replacement indicator line. The IOM value is trusted as correct. The gauge is read, confirmed, and the job is signed off. The problem is that the IOM pressure value, while set on site by the technician, originates from the OEM specification with a new blade in mind. It was not derived with the protection of a $1.5–$2M belt asset as the design constraint. And it takes no account of what the lever geometry does to that setting as the blade wears away beneath it. Following the IOM to the letter is not maintenance negligence. It is exactly what the procedure asks. The procedure is incomplete.
Tensioners are not force applicators. They are Class 1 lever systems. The same input force produces a range of output forces depending on where the load is applied along the lever, and on a primary belt cleaner that load point moves continuously as the blade wears. Every mainframe reset restores the arm angle. It does nothing to the load arm length. The load arm keeps shortening. The blade tip force keeps rising. The belt keeps taking more.
No standard OEM pressure setting document accounts for this lever effect. The consequence is a belt contact force that starts above the recommended ceiling and rises from there, at constant gauge pressure, with no warning. The IOM is followed. The blade wears. The belt takes progressively more force per unit area at the highest-stress position on the conveyor. Belt top cover wear accelerates. Splice fatigue accumulates. The cost is usually attributed to belt age or coal abrasiveness. The tensioner is rarely implicated. It should be.
Conveyor Belt Cleaner XHD Engineering: The Class 1 Lever Calculation
How the tensioner geometry changes as the blade wears
A conventional XHD air tensioner primary cleaner connects the air spring to the blade tip via a central pivot. The air spring acts above the pivot (effort arm, fixed). The blade contacts the belt below the pivot (load arm, variable). Contact force at the blade tip follows directly from the lever relationship:
Fspring is the total spring output from both tensioners combined, on belts 1,500 mm and above, dual tensioners are standard. Leffort is fixed at 150 mm. Lload is not fixed: it equals the pivot-to-blade-contact distance, which reduces with the blade from 302 mm at installation to 152 mm at end of life.
At installation, Lload is 302 mm. At end of blade life, it is 152 mm. Since tip force is inversely proportional to Lload, halving the load arm approximately doubles the tip force. Spring pressure constant. Gauge reading constant. Belt contact force doubled.
The worked example
Using field-measured data for a dual-tensioner configuration running 18 PSI (124 kPa) regulated air pressure (1,600 mm belt reference case):
At installation the blade stands 302 mm tall and the load arm is at its longest. At end of life the blade has worn to approximately 150 mm in height, shortening the load arm to 152 mm. The full calculation at the OEM pressure setting appears in the worked example below; the result is a 73% rise in tip force between installation and blade replacement, with no change to any gauge or setting.
Tip force rises 73% between installation and blade replacement. Contact pressure rises 67%, from a starting point already above the recommended ceiling. No parameter in the tensioner system changes. The geometry does it alone.
What Over-Pressure Does to Your Belt Asset
A 1,600 mm conveyor belt at a bulk materials handling facility carries replacement value in the order of $1.5–$2M per conveyor, including supply and installation. The primary cleaner position is where that asset takes its highest cyclic load. Every belt revolution, the full belt width passes under the cleaner blades at contact force. At 27 kPa, where a conventional blade reaches at end of blade life at its own OEM setting, three damage mechanisms run concurrently.
Top cover abrasion. The Archard Wear Law states that wear volume scales directly with normal contact force:
Splice fatigue. The cleaner position subjects each splice to its highest single-event dynamic load on every revolution. At contact pressures above 15 kPa, cyclic loading on the splice top plate and carcass-to-cover interface accelerates delamination. A conventional blade starts above that threshold on installation day and reaches 27 kPa at end of blade life. Mechanical splices are most vulnerable, but even mature vulcanised joints accumulate fatigue damage faster above the recommended ceiling. Splice replacement is one of the most expensive unplanned maintenance events on a bulk materials conveyor. The tensioner is rarely written into the root cause analysis. The lever geometry means it belongs there.
Self-reinforcing surface damage. Over-pressure generates micro-irregularities in the belt cover surface. Those irregularities cause blade chatter. Chatter produces impact loads significantly above the steady-state contact force on each pass. More surface damage follows. The mechanism compounds with time and is not arrested by reducing pressure after it begins.
Worked Example: OEM Pressure Settings, Conventional XHD Primary Cleaner
This worked example uses a 1,600 mm belt as the reference case, as this is one of the most common widths in high-throughput bulk materials handling. The calculation method and the pressure escalation behaviour apply equally to all belt widths; only the blade count, contact area, and OEM IOM pressure setting change per belt width. For a 1,600 mm belt the OEM IOM specifies 96 kPa (14 PSI) per tensioner, dual tensioner configuration, nine blades. This is the manufacturer's recommended setting. It is the number the technician is instructed to set and, at each mainframe reset, instructed to check and maintain. There is no adjustment schedule across the blade life. The IOM states one number. The gauge holds it. The belt receives whatever the lever geometry produces at that setting, at every stage of blade wear, with no further guidance from the OEM.
Running the lever calculation at that setting shows what the belt receives.
At installation: spring force per tensioner at 96 kPa is 1,367 N; both tensioners total 2,733 N. Load arm 302 mm. tip force of 1,358 N. contact pressure of 16 kPa, already 14% above the accepted industry recommended maximum, on day one, at the manufacturer’s own specified setting.
At end of blade life: the gauge still reads 96 kPa. Spring force is 2,584 N. Load arm has shortened to 152 mm. tip force of 2,550 N. contact pressure of 27 kPa, 90% above the recommended ceiling.
The setting was never wrong. The IOM value was followed exactly at every mainframe reset. The technician did everything correctly. The geometry did the rest. A 73% rise in tip force, delivered to the belt top cover and splice at the primary cleaner position, with no instrument on the system indicating any change, and no entry in the maintenance record showing any deviation from the specified procedure. The belt wears faster than it should. The splices fatigue sooner than they should. And the tensioner, set correctly to the OEM specification every single time, is the cause.
Assumptions and Source Data
All values in this worked example are drawn from two primary sources: the Goodyear 1B5-510 Wingprene air spring constant-pressure characteristic table, and Table 5 of the OEM IOM specifying airbag tensioner pressures by belt width. No values have been assumed or estimated. The calculation follows standard Class 1 lever mechanics throughout.
| Parameter | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Belt width (this example) | 1,600 mm | Reference case; method applies to all widths per OEM IOM Table 5 |
| Tensioner configuration | Dual (balance tube connected) | Table 5 OEM IOM: ** notation for belts ≥1,500 mm |
| OEM IOM pressure setting | 96 kPa (14 PSI) per tensioner | Table 5 OEM IOM: 1,600 mm row (values vary by belt width) |
| Air spring model | Goodyear 1B5-510 Wingprene | Goodyear constant-pressure characteristic data |
| Spring force at 96 kPa (14 PSI), 45.7 mm height | 307 lbf = 1,367 N per tensioner (2,733 N total) | Goodyear 1B5-510 constant-pressure characteristic table |
| Effort arm (spring centreline to pivot) | 150 mm (fixed) | Tensioner frame geometry |
| Load arm at new blade | 302 mm | Measured load arm at new blade |
| Load arm at end of life | 152 mm | Measured load arm at end of blade life |
| Blades per set | 9 blades total across mainframe | FTB-001-1 blade count table |
| Blade contact dimensions | 165 mm wide × 57.5 mm deep | Standard XHD blade specification |
| Total contact area | 85,163 mm² (9 × 165 × 57.5) | Calculated |
| Arm rotation per cycle | 0° to 15° (hard mechanical stop) | Tensioner resets to 0° at each mainframe reset; 15° maximum within any cycle |
Step-by-Step Calculation at Installation (0% Wear)
At installation the blade is new, the load arm is at its maximum of 302 mm, and the spring sits at its compressed height of 45.7 mm. The OEM IOM specifies 96 kPa (14 PSI) per tensioner, both tensioners connected via balance tube and operating simultaneously.
Step 1: Spring force. From the 1B5-510 constant-pressure data, spring force at 18 PSI and 45.7 mm height is 395 lbf (1,757 N) per tensioner. Scaling to 14 PSI: 1,757 × (14 ÷ 18) = 1,367 N per tensioner. Both tensioners combined: 2 × 1,367 = 2,733 N total.
Step 2: Tip force at blade contact point. Applying the Class 1 lever relationship:
Step 3: Normal force. At installation the cumulative rotation angle is 0°, so cos(0°) = 1. Normal force = 1,358 × 1.0 = 1,358 N.
Step 4: Contact pressure. Distributed across 85,163 mm² (0.085163 m²):
The accepted industry recommended maximum is 14 kPa. At installation, following the OEM IOM exactly, the blade is already applying 16 kPa, 14% above the recommended ceiling. The belt is over-loaded from the first revolution.
What Happens as the Blade Wears
At each mainframe reset the technician checks the pressure gauge and maintains it at the IOM value of 96 kPa (14 PSI). The gauge reading does not change. The tensioner arm resets to 0° and the spring recompresses to its full 2,733 N. But the load arm is now shorter than it was at installation. The same spring force, through a shorter load arm, delivers more force to the belt. Each reset makes the situation worse, not better.
Pre-Reset 1 (37.5% wear). The arm has reached its 15° hard mechanical stop. Load arm 246 mm. Spring force 2,379 N. Tip force = (2,379 × 0.150) ÷ 0.246 = 1,450 N. Normal force = 1,450 × cos(15°) = 1,401 N. Contact pressure = 16 kPa.
Post-Reset 1 (37.5% wear, arm returned to 0°). Gauge confirmed at 96 kPa. Arm resets. Spring force jumps back to 2,733 N. Load arm is still 246 mm. Tip force = (2,733 × 0.150) ÷ 0.246 = 1,667 N. Normal force = 1,667 × cos(0°) = 1,667 N. Contact pressure = 20 kPa, 39% above the limit. The reset has made it worse. The gauge still reads 96 kPa.
Pre-Reset 2 (75% wear). Arm at 15° stop again. Load arm 190 mm. Spring force 2,379 N. Tip force = (2,379 × 0.150) ÷ 0.190 = 1,878 N. Normal force = 1,878 × cos(15°) = 1,814 N. Contact pressure = 21 kPa.
Post-Reset 2 (75% wear, arm returned to 0°). Gauge confirmed 96 kPa. Spring force back to 2,733 N. Load arm 190 mm. Tip force = (2,733 × 0.150) ÷ 0.190 = 2,158 N. Normal force = 2,158 × cos(0°) = 2,158 N. Contact pressure = 25 kPa, 81% above the limit. Every reset procedure has been followed correctly.
End of blade life (100% wear). Arm at 15° stop. Load arm 152 mm. Spring force 2,379 N. Tip force = (2,379 × 0.150) ÷ 0.152 = 2,348 N. Normal force = 2,348 × cos(15°) = 2,268 N. Contact pressure = 27 kPa, 90% above the industry recommended maximum. The OEM procedure has been followed correctly at every step.
Full Blade Life: Contact Pressure at Each Milestone
| Milestone | Wear | Load arm | Total spring force | Tip force | Normal force | Contact pressure | vs 14 kPa limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Installation (arm 0°) | 0% | 302 mm | 2,733 N | 1,358 N | 1,358 N | 16 kPa | +14% |
| Pre-Reset 1 (arm at 15° stop) | 37.5% | 246 mm | 2,379 N | 1,450 N | 1,401 N | 16 kPa | +17% |
| Post-Reset 1 (arm reset to 0°, 96 kPa confirmed) | 37.5% | 246 mm | 2,733 N | 1,667 N | 1,667 N | 20 kPa | +39% |
| Mid-life (arm at 15° stop) | 60% | 212 mm | 2,379 N | 1,683 N | 1,626 N | 19 kPa | +36% |
| Pre-Reset 2 (arm at 15° stop) | 75% | 190 mm | 2,379 N | 1,878 N | 1,814 N | 21 kPa | +52% |
| Post-Reset 2 (arm reset to 0°, 96 kPa confirmed) | 75% | 190 mm | 2,733 N | 2,158 N | 2,158 N | 25 kPa | +81% |
| End of life (arm at 15° stop) | 100% | 152 mm | 2,379 N | 2,348 N | 2,268 N | 27 kPa | +90% |
Source: Goodyear 1B5-510 Wingprene air spring data. OEM IOM pressure: 96 kPa (14 PSI) per tensioner, dual tensioner configuration. Reference belt width: 1,600 mm. Standard XHD blade, 9 blades, 165 mm × 57.5 mm contact face. Industry recommended maximum: 14 kPa.
FM8's Engineering Stance, How Blade Geometry Changes the Outcome
FM8's position on this issue starts with the geometry. The lever mechanics described above cannot be eliminated by adjusting air pressure alone on a conventional blade design, the contact area is too small for a safe operating pressure to produce adequate cleaning force. Addressing over-pressure on conventional blades means accepting under-performance or over-pressure. The FM8 Super XHD resolves the conflict through three compounding design choices.
25% more air pressure. 39% less force at the belt surface.
FM8 specifies 18 PSI (124 kPa) operating pressure, 25% above the 14 PSI (96 kPa) conventional XHD baseline. That is a deliberate choice, not a conservative one. The FM8 Super XHD blade presents a 94.5 mm contact face against 57.5 mm for conventional XHD designs. For a 1,600 mm belt with nine blades, FM8 total contact area reaches 140,063 mm² against 85,163 mm² for the conventional design, roughly 64% more surface in contact with the belt at any moment.
Force distributes across that larger area. The conventional blade at its own 14 PSI OEM setting starts at 16 kPa. FM8, running 18 PSI, 25% more air pressure, starts at 12 kPa: 22% lower contact pressure at the belt surface, despite the higher air pressure going in. The larger area absorbs the higher spring force and spreads it. The belt sees less. The cleaning contact is greater. That counter-intuitive result, more pressure in, less force at the belt, is the central engineering argument for the FM8 Super XHD design and the reason it protects rather than attacks the belt asset.
Conventional XHD designs cannot achieve the same outcome through pressure management alone. Reducing air pressure to bring contact pressure within the accepted industry range on a 57.5 mm blade also reduces cleaning force below effective thresholds. The geometry does not allow both objectives simultaneously. FM8's 64% larger contact area resolves that conflict: higher cleaning force, lower belt pressure, by design.
4.4× stiffer, all of that contact area stays in contact
A physical rule governs how resistant any beam or blade is to bending under load: stiffness is proportional to the cube of its depth in the direction of that load. Double the depth and stiffness increases eight-fold. This is the h³ principle, where h is the blade height in the direction of bending. It applies equally to steel beams, aircraft wings, and polyurethane belt cleaner blades. A deeper blade is not just proportionally stiffer, it is disproportionately stiffer, because the cube relationship amplifies the advantage rapidly. FM8's 94.5 mm contact depth versus 57.5 mm for a conventional XHD design is a 64% depth increase. Cubed, that produces 4.4× greater bending stiffness:
In practical terms: for the same tensioner force, the FM8 Super XHD blade deflects 4.4 times less than a conventional XHD blade. Where the conventional blade bends 1 mm under load at its centre, FM8 bends 0.23 mm. That difference determines whether the full contact face stays flat against the belt or lifts away from it.
A conventional blade deflects under load at the primary cleaner position. The centre of the blade lifts away from the belt surface, concentrating contact at the edges and depositing carryback through the section where contact force is lowest.
FM8's stiffness holds the full 140,063 mm² contact face flat against the belt across the full belt width, for the full blade service life. Every mm² of that larger area is working. Edge-heavy wear, the field signature of mid-blade deflection in conventional designs, wastes 30–40% of usable blade material before the centre section establishes effective cleaning contact. FM8's stiffness eliminates that waste entirely. The blade lasts longer because it uses its full cross-section. The belt lasts longer because distributed force across a larger, flat contact face generates lower peak stress at any point on the cover surface.
The combined outcome of larger contact area and superior stiffness is not primarily a blade life story, it is a belt asset protection story. Fewer changeouts, lower contact pressure, and consistent full-width contact all reduce the cumulative loading on the belt cover and splice at the highest-stress position on the conveyor. The blade is consumable. The belt is the asset. FM8's design prioritises the asset.
A documented pressure management protocol
FM8's engineering team has calculated the optimal air pressure setting at each mainframe reset to hold contact pressure constant at 12 kPa across the full blade wear life. The lever geometry changes continuously; the pressure setting compensates for it.
Belt Cleaner Blade Wear Rate, Full Data Across the Wear Life
The following table summarises contact pressures at each key wear milestone for both blade types, each at its own specified setting: the conventional blade at its OEM IOM value of 14 PSI (96 kPa) per tensioner, FM8 Super XHD at 18 PSI (124 kPa). All figures are derived from field measurement data on dual-tensioner bulk handling conveyors. The 1,600 mm belt is used as the reference case throughout; the method and pressure escalation pattern apply across all belt widths. The industry recommended operating ceiling is 14 kPa.
| Blade wear | Load arm (measured) | Conv. tip force | Conv. XHD pressure | vs 14 kPa limit | FM8 Super XHD | vs 14 kPa limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0%, Installation | 302 mm | 1,358 N | 16 kPa | +14% | 12 kPa | −11% |
| 37.5%, Pre-Reset 1 | 246 mm | 1,668 N | 19 kPa | +35% | 15 kPa | +5% |
| 37.5%, Post-Reset 1 | 246 mm | 1,668 N | 19 kPa | +35% | 15 kPa | → 12 kPa managed |
| 60%, Mid-life | 212 mm | 1,839 N | 20 kPa | +40% | 15 kPa | +10% |
| 75%, Pre-Reset 2 | 190 mm | 2,163 N | 22 kPa | +57% | 17 kPa | +23% |
| 75%, Post-Reset 2 | 190 mm | 2,163 N | 22 kPa | +57% | 17 kPa | → 12 kPa managed |
| 100%, End of life | 152 mm | 2,550 N | 27 kPa | +90% | 18 kPa | +28% |
Highlighted rows: mainframe reset positions. FM8 “managed” figures apply the FM8 optimal reset pressure protocol. Conventional XHD contact pressure cannot be reduced to the safe operating range by pressure management alone, the contact area is insufficient.
Field Example: High-Throughput Bulk Materials Handling, Bowen Basin
Field data collected from a high-throughput Bowen Basin bulk materials export terminal provides the measurement basis for the contact pressure figures in this article provides the measurement basis for the contact pressure figures in this article. The data covers a full FM8 Super XHD blade service cycle from installation through to 60% wear at Day 295 of a documented trial programme, with extrapolated projection to end of life based on a confirmed decelerating wear rate of 0.11%/day.
At 60% wear, the field-calculated contact pressure for a conventional blade at its OEM setting on the same tensioner geometry is 20 kPa, 40% above the accepted industry operating ceiling. The FM8 Super XHD at the same wear percentage on the same tensioner records 15 kPa, and the next scheduled mainframe reset brings that to 12 kPa under the FM8 pressure management protocol.
The difference between 20 kPa and 12 kPa applied to the belt cover and splice position, on every revolution of a conveyor running 35 similar systems across a terminal, is not an engineering footnote. Across a multi-system bulk handling facility, managing primary cleaner contact pressure to within the accepted industry range is a belt asset management decision with measurable financial consequence.
Conveyor Belt Cleaner Total Cost of Ownership, Blade Life Is Not the Only Number
Primary belt cleaner performance is typically assessed on blade replacement interval and changeout labour. FM8 Super XHD outperforms conventional XHD designs on both: field data projects 21.2 months versus 7.5 months at equivalent duty, producing 2.8× fewer changeouts over a five-year period. That comparison is straightforward.
The harder comparison, and the more consequential one, is belt asset degradation rate. A conventional blade changing every 7.5 months completes 1.6 wear cycles per year. Every single cycle loads the belt above the accepted industry ceiling from installation to replacement, running from 16 kPa at installation to a post-reset spike of 25 kPa and 27 kPa at end of blade life. Over five years, that is six over-pressure events applied to the belt top cover and splice at the primary cleaner position, including two post-reset pressure spikes that hit the belt hardest precisely when the technician has just confirmed the gauge reading and signed off. The cumulative effect on cover thickness and splice fatigue life is real and measurable. It does not appear on the blade cost line in the maintenance budget. It appears years later, when the belt is replaced early or a splice fails unexpectedly. The tensioner is never cited. The lever geometry means it should be. The blade is a consumable. The belt is the asset. Managing contact pressure across the full blade wear life is not a blade performance question. It is a belt asset management decision.
Factoring belt asset protection into the total cost of ownership calculation strengthens the FM8 case beyond blade cost and changeout frequency. The blade is consumable. The belt is the asset. Reducing primary cleaner contact pressure to within the accepted industry operating range is the most direct available intervention for extending belt service life at the highest-load position on the conveyor.
Talk to FM8 Engineering
If your site runs conventional XHD primary cleaners on belts 1,500 mm and above, FM8 can calculate the actual blade-to-belt contact pressure at any point in the current blade wear life and compare it to the accepted industry operating range. In most cases, the result is a number that surprises. The OEM setting was followed. The maintenance procedure was correct. The belt has been taking more than it should from day one. That calculation takes your belt asset out of the abstract and puts a number on it that your maintenance team, reliability engineers, and procurement can all act on.
Contact FM8 Engineering